Session Details
Track A
Fundamentals of Auditing in Higher Education
Ransom McClung, Florida State University
Track Type: Accounting and Auditing
Field of Study: Auditing
Knowledge Level: Basic
Prerequisites: No prerequisites or advanced preparation required
Instructional Delivery Method: Group-Live
Maximum CPE credits: 18
Program Objectives:
Participants will learn to apply the fundamentals of internal auditing and new approaches to audits in universities.
Program Content: A perennial favorite, this course is tailored to meet the needs of internal auditors with a year or less experience of auditing experience in higher education. It will be equally beneficial to those with more experience who welcome a reinforcement of the fundamentals of internal auditing and new approaches to audits in universities. Day one includes a condensed version of auditor tools and techniques as we examine the IIA's new Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. This will cover establishing an institution-wide risk assessment approach (including risk assessments of information systems); essentials of fraud investigations; increasing efficiency of the audit process; audit reports; and other practical areas. This will provide a strong basis of understanding for days two and three during which we will cover auditing auxiliary enterprises and departmental reviews throughout the organization. A discussion of the auditor's role in Information Systems audits, emerging technologies (specifically ACUA’s risk dictionary) and consulting engagements will be covered on day three. Participants from past sessions commented: "I'd recommend this workshop to all new auditors." "Even auditors with years of experience can benefit." "This session far exceeded my expectations!"
Track B
Basic IT Audit Concepts
Phillip Hurd, CISSP, CISA, CBM, Georgia Institute of Technology
Field of Study: Auditing
Track Type: IT Auditing
Knowledge Level: Basic
Prerequisites: Participants are required to bring their own laptop.
Instructional Delivery Method: Group-Live
Maximum CPE credits: 18
Program Objectives: Participants will receive an overview of basic IT auditing information and learn how to apply this knowledge using case studies in a hands-on environment.
Program Content: This course will explore the fundamentals of IT Auditing including language basics, system concepts, a discussion of standard higher education systems, and a review of IT audits as compared to a standard operational audit. The course will also expose sensitive data concepts, and discuss incident response and the auditor’s role. The class will include hands-on training in a fun format including case studies the participants will use to immediately practice the information learned. This class will be limited to 36 participants to keep the case studies teams functional.
Track C
Auditing Banner
Terry Nolan, Georgia Institute of Technology
Mark Carter, Baylor University
Field of Study: Auditing
Track Type: IT Auditing
Knowledge Level: Basic
Prerequisites: No prerequisites or advanced preparation required.
Instructional Delivery Method: Group-Live
Maximum CPE credits: 18
Program Objectives: Participants will learn effective auditing techniques within various modules of Banner in an interactive environment.
Program Content: Be there for this groundbreaking course as we delve into auditing banner applications. This will hopefully be the start of an annual course where brains will be picked, ideas will be generated, and we will begin drafting an audit plan and audit programs for various Banner applications. This course is for anyone who currently uses or wants to learn more about SunGard Banner.
Whether you have just implemented Banner at your institution or have been using it for years, there is much to learn about this system and how to audit within it.
This will be an interactive session and we welcome those experienced Banner schools to participate and share their ideas and best practices.
Upon completion of this course, participants will be able to:
-
Understand the unique challenges and risks that using Banner presents
-
Develop audit plans and programs for specific modules of Banner
-
Identify potential pit falls and risk areas in Banner modules
-
Review the tips and best practices of more experienced Banner users
Track Type: IT
Field of Study: Auditing
Program Level: Intermediate
Prerequisites: Participants must bring their own laptop computer with a CD drive, IDEA Version 7 software or demo must be loaded on participant's laptop. Participants must be familiar with personal computers and should have a working knowledge of Windows and spreadsheet applications. Training data files will be provided by instructor in CD format.
Instructional Delivery Method: Group-Live
Maximum CPE credits: 18
Program Objectives: Participants will learn how to successfully obtain and import data into IDEA, mine and analyze data efficiently, and expand IDEA analysis by learning advance features.
Program Content: Participants will learn to use IDEA more efficiently in three course sections. During the first section, Acquiring & Importing Data, participants will review basic data formats; direct importing into IDEA; importing various standard file formats including ASCII delimited, ASCII fixed length, Access and Excel files; printing reports; and importing data directly from accounting software applications like QuickBooks.
During the second session, Analyzing & Interrogating Data Level 1, participants will learn key features such as: database management and how to reconcile data using control totals and field statistic; isolating items using IDEA's equation editor to enter criteria; creating a separate file by extracting records meeting a specified criteria; adding columns to pre-existing data to capture information; profiling data using stratifications to create bands based on ranges to facilitate data mining; summarizing records with the same field values and accumulate amounts in numeric fields; aging a file from a particular date into up to six specified intervals; searching for duplicate items based on one or more fields; identifying missing records in numerical or date sequences; joining data from separate but related files or comparing data from different time periods; and pulling samples using random and stratified random sampling.
During the third session, Analyzing & Interrogating Data Level 2, participants will learn key features such as: adding editable fields for comments, checking off items, or correcting data; how to correct errors or for "what-if scenarios" by re-running tasks with different parameters; creating pivot tables showing record counts, totals, averages, or minimum/maximum value; advanced concepts in database relationships using IDEA's join or visual connector features; @functions - performing more complex calculations and exception testing; extracting the top records within a group of records; and creating a series of secondary databases based on a key value.
Mix and Match
Track E
Fraud
John Hall, CPA, Hall Consulting
Track Type: Fraud
Field of Study: Auditing (Same for All)
Knowledge Level: Basic (Same for All)
Prerequisites: No prerequisites or advanced preparation required. (Same for All)
Instructional Delivery Method: Group-Live (Same for All)
Maximum CPE credits: 18
Program Objectives: See Specific Session
Program Content: See Specific Session
Session E1 – Helping Management Create An Anti-Fraud Environment
Auditors looking for opportunities to demonstrate unexpected value should assist managers in their fraud prevention and deterrence responsibilities. Upon completing this program, participants will be able to:
-
Explain who commits fraud, and why
-
Understand the deterrence provisions of applicable professional auditing standards
-
Sponsor a major fraud initiative, including 15 specific action steps
-
Conduct a Fraud Risk Assessment
-
Create a Fraud Risk Inventory
-
More effectively deploy critical skills in Interviewing, Data Mining and Forensic Accounting
-
Better manage prevention expectations
Session E2 – Fraud Detection for Internal Auditors (Part 1)
This two-part session will address the skills and mindset necessary to detect wrongdoing on audits. Participants will be able to:
• Avoid ineffective audit practices and behaviors
• Increase the probability that fraud and wrongdoing will be detected
• Brainstorm “Like a Thief”
• Develop and implement aggressive detection practices
• React to common fraud indicators, red flags and symptoms
• Build audit programs steps targeting fraud
Session E3 – Fraud Detection for Internal Auditors (Part 2)
This session will help auditors react to fraud indicators surfaced on projects. Participants will be able to:
• Build fraud risks into audit planning on every project
• Detect fraud schemes in results reporting
• Detect misappropriation schemes
• Utilize discovery testing, data analysis, interviewing and monitoring to improve detection
Session E4 – Fraud Based Interviewing
This session will provide a comprehensive view of the role of interviewing in fraud detection and investigation. Participants will be able to:
• Plan interviews, including the development of interview scripts
• Develop questions to enhance the likelihood of obtaining the desired responses
• Practice interviewing in a participant role play exercise
• Recognize the verbal signs of deception in audit interviews
• Recognize the non-verbal signs of deception in interviews and meetings
Session E5 – Fraud Handling Issues – Discovery through Case Closeout
This session covers the handling of fraud issues from discovery through case close-out. Participants will be able to:
• Define the role of internal auditing in the investigative process
• Understand six common investigative techniques
• Inventory skills needed for effective incident response and case management
• Build an effective response team
• Develop strategies for the special challenge areas of fraud by vendors, contractors and other third parties
Mix and Match
Track F
Managers/Directors
Track Type: Auditing and Accounting
Field of Study: Auditing
Knowledge Level: Basic (Same for All)
Prerequisites: No prerequisites or advanced preparation required. (Same for All)
Instructional Delivery Method: Group-Live (Same for All)
Maximum CPE credits: 18
Program Objectives: Participants will learn about various topics of interest to manager and director level auditors; marketing audit services, selling recommendations, P-card risks, and expectations of audit committee members.
Program Content: See Specific Session
Session F1 – Marketing Internal Audit Services
Larry Hubbard, Larry Hubbard & Associates
Do internal auditors need to market their services? Only if we want to stay in business! All service functions in a business are becoming more competitive, and internal auditing is no exception – nor should it be. We need to know the true market value of our services, and treat everyone as a paying client. This session will introduce “mission critical” issues for internal audit leaders to consider, as well as help develop the skills and plans necessary for all auditors to compete with the best. While we’re at it, we’ll talk why “selling yourself” is everybody’s business, and that every auditor is really self-employed.
Upon completing this course, participants will be able to:
- Define mission critical marketing issues
- Communicate the value added services that internal audit can provide to management
- Develop an internal audit marketing plan
- Develop necessary sales skills for auditors
Session F2 – Selling Your Recommendations to Management
Larry Hubbard, Larry Hubbard & Associates
It seems simple, and we’ve all heard it: Criteria, Condition, Cause, Effect, and Recommendation. If we write audit findings that way, it seems like everyone should agree with them – right? But, they don’t. Maybe the problem isn’t with the reader – maybe it’s with some of the words we use, like “finding”. Or maybe it’s because auditors can’t really come up with the Cause or Recommendation themselves. Or maybe it’s just because we have not taken the planning time to agree on the Criteria. This session will explore all these and have you rethinking your audit reporting process.
Upon completing this course, participants will be able to:
- Identify reasons why our findings are not embraced by management
- Write a finding which management will fully support and buy into
- Persuade management to take action on our recommendations, not just read the report
- Write a more useful audit report
- More effectively obtain agreement on the issues and recommendations in our reports
Session F3 – P-card Risks, Why Should You Care? (Parts 1 & 2)
Tom Salzman, Illinois State University
Colleges and Universities are quickly embracing Purchasing Cards (P-cards) as a means to a more efficient purchasing process for smaller dollar purchases. P-cards are applauded for streamlining purchases, saving money, and reducing paperwork. However, without proper processes and controls, P-cards can also put an organization at a higher risk for misuse of funds.
As an audit manager or director you will need to understand the importance of auditing this area. We will identify effective procedures for reviewing and evaluating all aspects of the P-card process and gain tools for evaluating internal controls. A list of merchant category codes will be provided along with the popular audit program that includes detailed testing techniques.
Upon completion of this course participants will be able to:
- Identify the most effective procedures for evaluating and controlling P-cards
- Evaluate critical issues surrounding the P-card process
- Receive excellent P-card auditing tools to take back to their staff auditors
- Identify quick and efficient ways to detect inappropriate purchases
- Learn how to catch the odd purchases such as internet, service and gift card purchases
- Understand the hidden dangers of relying on merchant code categories
- Understand proper reporting for 1099’s for services
Session F5 – What Do We Expect from Our Internal Auditors?
Audit Committee Members Panel
Have you ever wondered how audit committee members feel about their experiences serving on the audit committee? Or what they expected from their internal auditors? Now is your chance to find out as we have a panel discussion with current and former audit committee members and experts as they discuss their audit committee experiences.
Upon completion of this panel, participants will be able to:
- Learn what the audit committee expects from its internal audit team
- Identify committee member’s suggestions for making the internal audit function more responsive to audit committee needs
- Formulate a plan for preparing executive summaries to give audit committee members a high level overview of audit report conclusions and recommendations
Mix and Match
Track G
Compliance
Track Type: Compliance
Field of Study: See Specific Session
Knowledge Level: Basic (unless specified under each session)
Prerequisites: No prerequisites or advanced preparation required.
Instructional Delivery Method: Group-Live (Same for All)
Maximum CPE credits: 18
Program Objectives: See Specific Session
Program Content: See Specific Session
Session G1 – Developing an Effective Compliance Program
Dieter Lehnortt, University of Texas Southwest Medical Center
Field of Study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications
Knowledge Level: Intermediate
As an internal auditor, you are likely responsible for conducting an evaluation of your institution’s compliance program. Or, you may be responsible for working with your institution’s compliance officer to develop or further refine your compliance program. How should you do this? What makes a compliance program effective? How can effectiveness be measured in terms of a compliance program?
Upon completing this course, participants will be able to:
-
Identify the risks/hot issues that exist in today’s academic environment;
-
Understand the role of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in designing an effective compliance program;
-
Identify the essential elements of an effective compliance program;
-
Understand what elements of a compliance program should be regularly audited or monitored;
-
Understand what resources are available to the internal auditor when conducting this type of audit; and
-
Identify the differences in the roles of internal audit and compliance.
Session G2 – NCAA Compliance
Rich McGlynn, Auburn University
Bernard Hill, Auburn University
Field of Study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications
This course will give participants an overview of how to develop an effective compliance program for NCAA athletics. We will identify hot topics in athletics and discuss how to develop strategies for high risk compliance areas. We will review applicable NCAA legislation which affects how we audit athletic programs.
Upon completion of the course participants will be able to:
-
Understand applicable NCAA legislation
-
Identify hot topics and high risk areas in athletics
-
Identify athletic audit resources such as the ACUA/NCAA audit guide
-
List how internal auditing can assist a compliance office with institutional control
-
Define areas of concern within a compliance office
Session G3 – Managing Conflict of Interest in a University Environment
Urton Anderson, University of Texas Austin
Field of Study: Regulatory Ethics
Knowledge Level: Intermediate
Conflict of Interest has always been pervasive in the academic environment. However, recently higher education has come under increased scrutiny regarding how colleges and universities have managed these conflicts in a variety of areas ranging from clinical trials, student financial aid, study abroad programs, textbook selection, to even faculty involvement in student job placement.
The objective of this session is to examine “conflict of interest” in the university environment from an organizational corruption perspective. In this perspective the goal becomes the development of an organizational culture in which the occurrence of organizational corruption (in this case, instances where conflicts of interest lead to actions which are considered illegal or unethical by societal standards) is held to an acceptable level. In this session a number of practical techniques to achieving this goal will be presented and session participants will have an opportunity to share solutions from their own organizations.
Upon completion of this session participants should be able to:
-
Define conflict of interest and understand how it arises in various forms in a university’s research, teaching, and business operations
-
Assess the risks arising from conflicts of interest in the various processes and areas of operations
-
Develop appropriate strategies and techniques to manage conflicts of interests
-
Design appropriate monitoring and auditing programs for addressing conflict of interest risk.
Session G4 – Managing Effort Reporting Compliance
Greg Bedell, Huron Consulting
Field of Study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications
Knowledge Level: Overview
Effort Reporting is an increasingly complex aspect of sponsored projects administration in an ever-uncertain regulatory environment. Federal regulations provide limited guidance as to how effort reporting should be managed. Consequently, the threat of significant financial penalties looms over those institutions that fail to employ strong policies, systematic processes, and effective technology to maintain consistency with government rules and regulations surrounding effort reporting.
This session will provide an overview of effort reporting, discuss the key challenges associated with effort reporting, and present participants with suggestions as to how to handle those compliance concerns. Upon completion of the course participants will be able to:
-
Understand why effort reporting is important and why we have to do it correctly
-
List the basic requirements that should be addressed to fulfill institutional effort reporting
-
Identify common effort reporting challenges within the institution.
-
Identify common effort reporting findings from the government’s point of view
Participants will engage in a discussion forum around several sample case study / scenarios on effort reporting.
Session G5 – Financial Aid: Public Policy, Politics, and Getting the Job Done
Edwin Eisendrath, Huron Consulting
Field of Study: Specialized Knowledge and Applications
Knowledge Level: Overview
Increased scrutiny from regulators and urgent new public policy arguments put financial aid practices under a harsh spotlight. A.G. Cuomo’s investigation into recommended lenders served as a wake up call to practitioners. More data regarding competitiveness of American colleges and universities internationally has changed the nature of the financial aid discussion. All this takes place in the context of anxiety about the rising price of collegiate education.
This session will provide an overview of the political landscape in which financial aid professionals work. We will cover recent data on college participation rates and international competitiveness and connect the data to public policy.
Upon completion of the session, participants will be able to:
-
Identify the risks and hot button issues in financial aid practices today
-
Recognize issues that can bring unwanted attention from regulators
-
Identify policy implications of federal and state financial aid decisions
